Subaru Outback 2003 vs Volvo S80 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo S80 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 245 HP | 109 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 297 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 9.8 | 4.9 - 11.3 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`840 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |