Subaru Outback 2003 vs Subaru Outback 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.5 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 245 HP | 167 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 297 NM | 229 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.5 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 9.8 | 8.4 - 8.6 | |
|
Subaru Outback 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2003 is smaller. Subaru Outback 2003 is 5 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback 2009, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback 2003 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1726 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2003 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Subaru Outback 2009. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`840 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
| |