Subaru Outback 2009 vs Subaru Outback 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.6 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 - 249 HP | 165 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 350 NM | 226 - 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.4 seconds | 8.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.6 | 8.5 - 9.8 | |
|
Subaru Outback 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Outback 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Outback 2009 is larger. Subaru Outback 2009 is 5 cm longer than the Subaru Outback 2003, 5 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Outback 2009 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1726 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback 2009 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Subaru Outback 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |