Subaru Impreza 2000 vs Hyundai Lantra 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 139 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Impreza engine produces 79 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 290'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Lantra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Lantra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 5 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Impreza is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Subaru Impreza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Subaru Impreza, so Subaru Impreza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |