Subaru Impreza 1998 vs BMW 3 series 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Subaru Impreza engine produces 25 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 6 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Impreza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Subaru Impreza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is smaller. Subaru Impreza is 12 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Subaru Impreza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Subaru Impreza, so Subaru Impreza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |