Subaru Impreza 2003 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Subaru Impreza is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 265 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 143 - 343 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 - 15.9 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.1 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
|
Subaru Impreza petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Impreza is 31 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Subaru Impreza has 84 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`280 | ~ 1`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Kia Optima has
| |