Subaru Forester 1997 vs Subaru Outback 1998

 
Subaru Forester
1997 - 2000
Subaru Outback
1998 - 2002
Body: Crossover / SUVEstate car / wagon
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP156 HP
Torque: 184 NM223 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Forester engine produces 31 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.09.0
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway880 km on highway
610 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Subaru Outback gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.72 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.60 m1.58 m
Subaru Forester is 27 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1649 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`015
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 18001200
Pros and Cons:
    Subaru Outback has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv