Subaru Forester 1997 vs Subaru Forester 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester 1997 and Subaru Forester 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester 1997 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester 1997 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 1997 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 1997 and Subaru Forester 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester 1997 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Subaru Forester 2002 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester 1997 has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Subaru Forester 2002, so Subaru Forester 2002 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |