Subaru Forester 2002 vs Subaru Outback 2003
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 65 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Subaru Outback. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 470 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 28 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
| |