Subaru Forester 2005 vs Toyota RAV4 2006

 
Subaru Forester
2005 - 2008
Toyota RAV4
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 158 HP152 HP
Torque: 186 NM194 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12 seconds
Subaru Forester engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 8 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
590 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Engine production duration: 16 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XVUsed also on Toyota Avensis Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.40 m
Width: 1.74 m1.82 m
Height: 1.59 m1.68 m
Subaru Forester is 8 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 387 litres586 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1470 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 199 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`110
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 38005200
Rating in user reviews: 9.2/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • timing belt engine
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv