Subaru Forester 2008 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 59 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is larger. Subaru Forester is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 3 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Forester is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester has 48 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |