Subaru Forester 2011 vs Opel Antara 2010

 
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Opel Antara
2010 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 147 HP184 HP
Torque: 350 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds9.7 seconds
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Forester engine produces 37 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Antara. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1160 km on highway
920 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.60 m
Width: 1.78 m1.85 m
Height: 1.70 m1.76 m
Subaru Forester is smaller.
Subaru Forester is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres402 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1391 litres
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Forester has 48 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.7 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`050no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 62008000
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Antara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv