Subaru Forester 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 38 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 84 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |