Subaru Forester 2016 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 121 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 117 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 412 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |