Subaru Forester 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 87 - 158 HP | |
Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 144 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | 10.9 - 19.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 6.6 - 11.0 | |
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.74 m | |
Subaru Forester is 26 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 258 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`863 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |