Subaru Forester 1997 vs Kia Sportage 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Sportage can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Kia Sportage also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 112 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 184 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12.4 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 7.0 - 10.0 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 10 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 667 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |