Subaru Forester 2002 vs Subaru Forester 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 230 HP | 158 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 - 320 NM | 186 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 13.4 seconds | 6 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 11.0 | 9.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Subaru Forester 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2002 is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 387 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Forester 2002 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester 2005. The Subaru Forester 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
| |