Subaru Forester 2008 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 230 HP | 106 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 350 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.7 seconds | 11.5 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 11.0 | 7.0 - 9.4 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 51 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 184 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Subaru Forester has 266 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Subaru Forester can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`016 | ~ 1`888 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |