Subaru Forester 2008 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 230 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 350 NM | 176 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 12.7 seconds | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 11.0 | 7.5 - 10.6 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 91 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`016 | ~ 2`331 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |