Subaru Forester 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Toyota RAV4
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 147 - 263 HP150 - 177 HP
Torque: 198 - 350 NM198 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 12.4 seconds9.3 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 10.56.0 - 9.6
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.39 m
Width: 1.78 m1.83 m
Height: 1.69 m1.71 m
Subaru Forester is 17 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres586 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1752 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 136 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`027~ 2`137
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 60009800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv