Subaru Forester 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Honda CR-V
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 147 - 263 HP150 - 166 HP
Torque: 198 - 350 NM192 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 12.4 seconds10.2 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 10.57.4 - 9.5
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.54 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Subaru Forester is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres524 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 74 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`027~ 2`097
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 60008600
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv