Subaru Forester 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 240 HP | 124 - 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 350 NM | 187 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | 9.4 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.5 | 4.9 - 8.5 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Subaru Forester equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 72 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`055 | ~ 2`124 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 12 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |