Smart ForTwo 2004 vs Smart ForTwo 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Diesel | 0.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 41 HP | 45 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 19.8 seconds | |
| Smart ForTwo 2004 engine produces 4 HP less power than Smart ForTwo 2007, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Smart ForTwo 2007. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.3 l/100km | 4.5 l/100km | |
|
The Smart ForTwo 2004 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Smart ForTwo 2004 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForTwo 2004 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Smart ForTwo 2004 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2007. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.50 m | 2.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.56 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo 2004 is smaller, but slightly higher. Smart ForTwo 2004 is 20 cm shorter than the Smart ForTwo 2007, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo 2004 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 221 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Smart ForTwo has
| |