Smart ForTwo 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.7 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Smart ForTwo engine produces 17 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Smart ForTwo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Smart ForTwo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForTwo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Jazz) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForTwo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.50 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but slightly higher. Smart ForTwo is 134 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 8.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |