Smart ForTwo 2007 vs Smart ForTwo 2010

 
Smart ForTwo
2007 - 2010
Smart ForTwo
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 84 HP71 HP
Torque: 120 NM92 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds13.7 seconds
Smart ForTwo 2007 is more dynamic to drive.
Smart ForTwo 2007 engine produces 13 HP more power than Smart ForTwo 2010, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Smart ForTwo 2010. Thanks to more power Smart ForTwo 2007 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Smart ForTwo 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Smart ForTwo 2007 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Smart ForTwo 2007 could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Smart ForTwo 2007 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForTwo 2010.
Fuel tank capacity: 33 litres33 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway820 km on highway
500 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Smart ForTwo 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 2.70 m2.70 m
Width: 1.56 m1.56 m
Height: 1.54 m1.54 m
Both cars are similar in size. Smart ForTwo 2007 and Smart ForTwo 2010 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres220 litres
Turning diameter: 8.8 meters8.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`0501`020
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 32004600
Pros and Cons: Smart ForTwo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Smart ForTwo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv