Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Smart ForTwo engine produces 469 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 599 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Smart ForTwo reaches 100 km/h speed 8.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 13.9 | |
|
The Smart ForTwo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Smart ForTwo consumes 9.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Smart ForTwo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1440 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 33 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Smart ForTwo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.70 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 209 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 32 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 148 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 2.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`020 | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |