Smart ForTwo 2010 vs Smart ForFour 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForTwo
2010 - 2013
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Smart ForFour can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.8 - 1.01.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 54 - 102 HP64 - 177 HP
Torque: 89 - 147 NM92 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 16.8 seconds6.9 - 15.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 5.24.6 - 6.8
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 2.70 m3.75 m
Width: 1.56 m1.68 m
Height: 1.55 m1.45 m
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher.
Smart ForTwo is 106 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data910 litres
Smart ForFour has more luggage space.
Smart ForTwo has 48 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour.
Turning diameter: 8.8 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 1.7 metres less than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`039~ 1`450
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 46002000
Pros and Cons: Smart ForTwo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Smart ForFour has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv