Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Audi A2 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Smart ForTwo
2012 -
Audi A2
2000 - 2005
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Audi A2 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.8 - 1.01.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 54 - 102 HP61 - 110 HP
Torque: 89 - 147 NM126 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 16.8 seconds9.8 - 14.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 5.22.9 - 5.9
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A2.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 2.70 m3.83 m
Width: 1.56 m1.67 m
Height: 1.56 m1.55 m
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Smart ForTwo is 114 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1085 litres
Audi A2 has more luggage space.
Smart ForTwo has 170 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2.
Turning diameter: 8.8 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi A2, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`035~ 1`452
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 70002600
Pros and Cons: Smart ForTwo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi A2 has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv