Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |