Skoda Fabia 2007 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 16 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1163 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 12 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |