Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Chevrolet Kalos 2005

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2006
Chevrolet Kalos
2005 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP83 HP
Torque: 170 NM123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds12.1 seconds
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 32 HP more power than Chevrolet Kalos, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Chevrolet Kalos. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.5
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Kalos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway750 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m3.88 m
Width: 1.65 m1.67 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Skoda Fabia is 34 cm longer than the Chevrolet Kalos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 438 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Kalos, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6551`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Kalos has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv