Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Chevrolet Kalos 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 83 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 123 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 32 HP more power than Chevrolet Kalos, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Chevrolet Kalos. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Kalos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 34 cm longer than the Chevrolet Kalos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Kalos, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | low | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Kalos has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Chevrolet Kalos has
| |