Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 21 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 63 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |