Skoda Fabia 2001 vs Volkswagen Bora 1999

 
Skoda Fabia
2001 - 2004
Volkswagen Bora
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 101 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM285 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds11 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 14 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.3
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1240 km on highway
910 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.41 m
Width: 1.65 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 19 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1225 litresno data
Volkswagen Bora has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 34 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6951`880
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 12001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv