Skoda Fabia 2003 vs Fiat Stilo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 30 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.8 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |