Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Skoda Roomster have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`639 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Roomster has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |