Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 288 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`674 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |