Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | 7.8 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.8 | 3.4 - 4.9 | |
|
On average, the Skoda Fabia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is larger. Skoda Fabia is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`585 | ~ 1`634 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |