Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Peugeot 206
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.1 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 50 - 130 HP60 - 110 HP
Torque: 84 - 310 NM94 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 20.9 seconds9.4 - 15.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.84.3 - 7.1
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.82 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Skoda Fabia is 14 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres992 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Fabia has 50 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 24 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`579~ 1`521
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 206 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv