Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Seat Cordoba 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 - 115 HP | 70 - 105 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 240 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 18.3 seconds | 10.6 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.8 | 4.6 - 7.5 | |
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
789 litres | no data | |
Seat Cordoba has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 47 litres less trunk space than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`654 | ~ 933 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |