Skoda Fabia 2008 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 65 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 240 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 16.8 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.5 | 5.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Roomster. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1485 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`626 | ~ 1`721 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
| |