Seat Toledo 1994 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 22 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |