Seat Toledo 1994 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Ford Escort. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.9 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 22 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |