Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 200 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 20 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Felicia | Used also on Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Toledo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 200 has
| |