Seat Toledo 1994 vs Toyota Carina E 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |