Seat Toledo 1994 vs Fiat Croma 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 26 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 20 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |