Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 22 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |