Seat Toledo 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 18 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 6.7 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |