Seat Toledo 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Mazda 323. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.34 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |