Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 41 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 200 has
| |