Seat Toledo 1991 vs Nissan Micra 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 79 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 16 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Toledo is 62 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 8 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |